Arguments For and Against Capital Punishment
Completion requirements
Arguments for Capital Punishment
- Humans who take the life of others do not have the right to live themselves.
- The death penalty is the appropriate punishment for criminals who have committed brutal crimes.
- The death penalty serves as a deterrent for potential criminals who might think twice before they do something awful.
- Life imprisonment is expensive and costs the state too much money.
Arguments against Capital Punishment
- Lower class citizens and ethnic minorities are sentenced to death more often than middle or upper classes and whites.
- The death penalty is always immoral. We have no right to take the lives of others, even if they have committed a serious crime.
- The death penalty is not the appropriate penalty for crimes other than murder.
- The judicial system makes mistakes. There have been a number of wrongful executions in the past. DNA testing can prove that an executed inmate was, in fact, innocent.
- Life imprisonment is a more effective way of punishing a criminal.
Words
- appropriate = right, correct
- awful = terrible
- citizen = a person who lives in a country and has rights there
- commit = carry out
- deterrent = strong warning; if you show someone that doing something illegal will have bad results
- DNA = material that carries the genetic information of the cells in your body
- effective = useful, successful
- ethnic minorities = small groups of people from other countries and nationalities
- immoral = not right
- inmate = prisoner
- innocent = not guilty
- judicial system = system of laws and courts in a country
- life imprisonment = being locked up in prison for your whole life
- potential = possible, future
- punishment = you make someone suffer because they have done something illegal
- sentence = to give someone a form of punishment
- serious = grave, bad
- serve = here: works as
- wrongful execution = here: when a person who has been executed later turns out to have been innocent